The objectives of this research ar e to describe the types of presupposition used by the characters in Ice Age: Collision Course movie and to interpret the intended meaning of the characters’ utterances in Ice Age: Collision Course movie. The theory of presupposition proposed by Yule and the theory of context are used by the researcher to answer the formulated research questions. This research is a qualitative study applying descriptive-qualitative method. The subject of this research is a movie entitled Ice Age: Collision Course directed by Mike Thurmeier. The data were some scenes including the utterances said by speaker and heard by hearer. The data analysis was conducted by classifying and categorizing the data to find the inferences. The triangulation method was applied to gain the trustworthiness of the data by consulting his findings with his consultants and friends. The findings of the research are as follows: in Ice Age: Collision Course, all six types of presupposition proposed by Yule are found. Those six types of presupposition are Existential Presupposition (20%), Factive Presupposition (5%), Non-Factive Presupposition (2.5%), Lexical Presupposition (10%), Structural Presupposition (22%), and Counter Factual Presupposition (7.5%). Then Structural Presupposition is the most-used type of presupposition. On the other hand, Non-Factive Presupposition is the least-used type of presupposition found in the conversations between the characters in Ice Age: Collision Course movie. The intended meanings in the conversation are gained by analyzing the context because in pragmatic study, context is essential to figure out the implied meaning. The context of the conversation between the characters in Ice Age: Collision Course is gained through four factors. They are (1) the participants, (2) the setting or social context of the interaction, (3) the topic of the conversation, and (4) the function of the conversation. Keywords: Pragmatics, Presupposition, Intended Meaning, Ice Age: Collision Course Movie.